Everyone's crapping on me for the choice of graph. I originally tried a 2d plot but the lines obscured each other.
More importantly, it wasn't intended to be a rigorous data representation because the results vary significantly between runs. I was just trying to communicate the results in an approximate fashion; the improvements are dramatic enough that approximate is good enough, IMO.
And in case anyone is thinking about suggesting errors bars: please don't.
More importantly, it wasn't intended to be a rigorous data representation because the results vary significantly between runs. I was just trying to communicate the results in an approximate fashion; the improvements are dramatic enough that approximate is good enough, IMO.
And in case anyone is thinking about suggesting errors bars: please don't.