Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | userbinator's commentslogin

I agree with the first comment there, that it's important to know which revision of the 386 this came from, since the 386 did receive many small changes over its 22-year production run.

I wonder how long it'll be before they release the source for the earliest Windows versions. The fact that they still have the source for this very old DOS at least gives hope that they also do for old Windows.

The day they would make Windows 2000 codebase open source (or source available) would be the day I could die happy (although I'd probably be long dead anyways by the time there's a glimmerof chance of it happening). What a beautiful, smooth-running operating system it was.

Agreed. It's still my favorite Windows version.

There is a mostly complete leak of it...

I am sure that there is a lot good material to take inspiration and learning even from the early Windows 3.11.

Do a deep dive into how OS/360 formalized to having DOS.

/s ?

They waited a couple decades too long for this to be of interest.

Apparently people here will also censor speech that doesn't align with their narratives, but will complain loudly when speech that does is censored.

There's likely plenty of them still in use in industrial/embedded applications.

Algorithms in the LZ family were always popular with self-decompressing executables, because of their simplicity and high efficiency; like a natural extension of RLE, they can achieve very high compression ratios while needing only a few dozen bytes for a decompressor.

employee's government furnished phones

In other words these were always the property of the government.


Classic bureaucracy.

No, it would be a waste to spend countless millions (nevermind the human capital of "attention") on the campaigning, without first validating that a true quorom of people even want to think about this, rather than a very vocal minority. It's a governance equivalent of saying "step up or shut up", and it's not stupid or wasteful

You're too eager to label legit "governance" as bureaucracy imho


Unfortunately anything vaguely political tends to devolve quickly.

RE'ing drivers and porting them is one of those things that AI turns out to be really useful for, and there have been a few of such projects posted here already. But of course the author has to drive it in that direction rather than let it just glue stuff together.

If they reverse engineered the drivers then why do they need a virtual cpu and a Linux kernel to run them. Is this reverse engineering or just installing software in a weird environment?

Speaking of not just gluing stuff together with usb/ip could one make a virtual WebUSB host kernel module that could be used by the Linux kernel USB stack? They most likely would not want to do that because then all of the code would be GPL and would have to be shared with the public.


I don't think a usb host driver is necessarily tainted into being GPL? But if it is, plenty of non-gpl oses that can run SANE.

Big Tech in general.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: