Maybe MS wants people to use Co Pilot.

The US govt can tell banks to cut off your access to USD.

And how does BTC play in this scenario?

You can send BTC to the affected person or org and then they are free to decide what to do with it.

This happened to Wikileaks.

Epstein was murdered in a high security prison so that he does not talk.

> because we risk contaminating Mars with organic stuff coming from the Earth.

What is the alternative, not go to Mars?

Do actual science. Send robots there, like Curiosity and Perseverance.

And over all: start recognising that there is no point in sending humans to Mars other than "uh uh it's cool we sent someone there and they came back alive".

I have nothing against the fact that it is cool. And I watched Artemis enthusiastically because it is really, really cool. What I hate is when people seem to be so sure that this is "the new age of space exploration" and we will become a "multiplanetary species".

It's trivial to check how far the next star is (more than 4 light-years) and realise that we would need thousands of years to reach it, and there is no Earth there.

Mars is the last stop, and going there doesn't bring us anything. Instead of that, we can do actual science. Did you follow Rosetta, landing on a comet? Because this is not only super cool, but also real science. But nobody gives a shit about that, because we want humans in space for some reason.

> start recognising that there is no point in sending humans to Mars

Fair point but if you want to inspire other humans you need to send humans not robots.

I disagree. Look at how many people work in robotics versus how many people are astronauts...

Do you really think that the job is completely different for workers between building a rocket sending a robot and building a rocket sending humans? Do you think that it was easy to send Curiosity or Rosetta, and that the employees found it boring?

A robot travelling on moon or mars is not the same thing as a man walking on moon or mars.

We need both.

> just look at the insane plot/ending of the film Singham.

What does that even mean?

Spoiler alert for the film. The film ends, not with any kind of officially sanctioned justice, but with a completely extrajudicial killing, for which audiences are expected to cheer. This is exactly the point of an untrustworthy executive branch getting us cheering for what is essentially organized crime that favors our side over another.

Just watched the end scenes and this more like an execution in a heroic light.

I have not seen something like this in this significants, vibe and presumed statement in western media. There are a many examples of uncelebrated murderes of “the bad guy” which the hero does not want or does “against their will” but I have seen no western examples of this kind of celebration of killing the bad guy.

ok instead of depending on movies you can look and learn from history. Look up the French Revolution.

> North Korea, seemingly invulnerable

Because of China not because of the nukes.

Such complaints are valid for AI model releases, that tells us that they are not using their own models to test their own release pages.

Maybe they did get their models to test their pages, but they didn't tell their models to pretend that they're browsing on mobile using a 3G connection.

This is the problem with propaganda, you have been told that he was evil as most Indians are led to believe but for people in Sri Lanka he was a great leader.

Most people don't care as long as it does not affect them directly.

They should ideally have automated tests with the option models and smaller context window to check there are no regressions.