So that the AI model that generated code can get proper credit and we'll know to use (or not use it) next time.

That's not at all what someone who wants to "tell at a glance who used AI" actually wants to know.

I'll consider avoiding jj because of this, personally.

It's always the first step. The second step would be switching the license and only supporting the changed licensed version, then "donating" the unmaintained version to the community.

Has Google ever done this before though? I'm not much of a fan of Google either, but they tend to just abandon products outright rather than relicence them.

No, you need to use -nw with emacs to make it apples to apples. Then it's emacs 0m0.095s vs nvim 0m0.057s:

    $ time nvim -es --cmd 'vim.cmd("q")'

    real 0m0.057s
    user 0m0.016s
    sys 0m0.017s

    $ time emacs -Q -e kill-emacs

    real 0m0.230s
    user 0m0.165s
    sys 0m0.064s

    $ time emacs -nw -Q -e kill-emacs

    real 0m0.095s
    user 0m0.057s
     sys 0m0.017s

Shouldn't matter when I am not on GUI seat. In my SSH session with X11 forwarding there is no DISPLAY emacs could use.

Tried it anyways, looks the same:

  $ time emacs -nw -Q -e kill-emacs
  real    0m0.075s
  user    0m0.062s
  sys     0m0.013s

s/with/without/

I use an emacs based system with org-mode, org-habits, and howm.

I am an org-mode user myself, but I find the lack of inherent structure pretty paralysing and have built-up complex nested trees of tasks and org-roam notes that I haven't looked at in years. I fear org-agenda and the many year-long incomplete tasks I have been putting off.

I know this is probably not something that a tech tool will fix on its own, but do you mind sharing your config and how you converged to something that worked?

I think they are saying you sound like:

"It's One Banana, Michael. What Could It Cost, $10?" - Lucille Bluth

Location: Dallas, TX

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: Haskell, Rust, Nix, Golang, Python, Linux, Mentoring, Javascript/HTML5, SQL, NoSQL, REST APIs, Django, Terraform, Docker, PostgreSQL

Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/codygman/

Email: cody@codygman.dev

Over 15 years I've worked both in large corporations in cross-functional teams, small teams (5-10) at small to medium companies, and alone as a freelancer taking on projects across many different technologies. My focus in the past few years has been on being a force multiplier for my team and increasing predictability, stability, and developer enjoyment of output. I'm also a big proponent of mentoring and frequently create tech talks from the daily work notes I take so that the lessons from any challenges I face benefit not only me, but my team as well.

My preference is functional languages and companies that use Nix and/or NixOS, but it's more important to have a healthy company and team than any specific technology.

I also do Parkour in my free time, and I have given lessons to coworkers in the past who are interested :)

A great video introduction to magit: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_zfvQkJsYwI

> Do. Not. Break. Workflows. Software that doesn't understand this principle is something I don't trust not to break itself when its developers decide to get cute.

What use would magit be if it presented the exact same interface as `git rebase`?

Do you know what it would lose?

> Did I stop and read the docs to figure out how it wanted me to rebase in this brave new world? Hell no.

I suppose you don't since you didn't read the docs.

Why try it in the first place if you expected it to be the exact same?

> Forced error handling semantics so that unhappy paths are easily enumerated

They could have just added pattern matching and exhaustivity checking though, right?